BGonline.org Forums
$$ 16-cube reship
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:59 a.m.
In Response To: $$ 16-cube reship (Daniel Murphy)
If we're going to be pushing the mathematical limits here then it's important to be precise. Are we really interested in a money-game position that is a take and that has the lowest cubeless probability of winning? The optimal checker play in a cubeless game may differ from the optimal checker play in a money game. It seems odd to compare money-game positions according to the probability of winning if the checkers are played without a cube. I would think that one would want to define "game winning chances" for a money game as the probability of winning the game if the rest of the game is played optimally for money.
Messages In This Thread
- $$ 16-cube reship
Alejandro -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Stick -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 9:33 p.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Alejandro -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 9:40 p.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Adam Versaw -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:08 p.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:40 p.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Chase -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 12:21 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 12:53 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Bob Koca -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 12:58 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:27 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Bob Koca -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:39 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:59 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Bob Koca -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:07 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Bob Koca -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:55 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
Chuck Bower -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:02 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship -- with some bot data
Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:35 a.m.
- $$ 16-cube reship
neilkaz -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:28 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.