BGonline.org Forums

62S-32 XG 4 ply RO

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:29 a.m.

In Response To: 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO (Timothy Chow)

From this point of view W is clearly best but U isn't so bad. No way I'm playing S though.

Backgammon, for the last ~25-30 years, was effectively monolingual. Despite all the recent arguments for efficiency of notation, are we (the BG community as a whole) really better off with this second language?

Messages In This Thread

• 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:16 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 11:16 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 11:18 p.m.
    • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
      Chuck Bower -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:29 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        David Rockwell -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 2:40 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        Stick -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 3:19 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 6:16 a.m.
        • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
          Chase -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 5:57 p.m.
          • BEACON (with diagrams)
            Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 23 May 2010, at 8:04 p.m.
            • BEACON (with diagrams)
              Chase -- Monday, 24 May 2010, at 4:42 p.m.
  • 62S-32, data
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 23 May 2010, at 8:58 p.m.