BGonline.org Forums

31P-65R-xx

Posted By: mtuhtan
Date: Thursday, 6 May 2010, at 5:26 a.m.

In Response To: 31P-65R-xx (Nack Ballard)

I'm not questioning your methodology, but I thought I should say something in case of oversight. Did you consider including 51, 53 and/or 54 in this group?

I considered 51, but I'm saving that for next thread with 31P-xxP-51

In cases of 53 and 54, splitting seems clear when analyzing with XGR+ so I didn't plan to do them, but if you think they would be good for comparison with 52 - I will do them and post rollout result in this thread.

Messages In This Thread

• 31P-65R-xx
  mtuhtan -- Wednesday, 5 May 2010, at 3:32 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 5 May 2010, at 9:24 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 5 May 2010, at 9:58 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 5 May 2010, at 11:22 p.m.
    • 31P-65R-xx
      mtuhtan -- Thursday, 6 May 2010, at 5:26 a.m.
      • 31P-65R-xx
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 6 May 2010, at 6:21 a.m.
  • 31P-65R-21 - Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 7 May 2010, at 2:35 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-52 - Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 7 May 2010, at 2:36 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 7 May 2010, at 2:37 p.m.