[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Would the advocates for the new rule state how they would rule Ken's two examples?

Posted By: Colin Owen
Date: Thursday, 9 February 2017, at 7:42 p.m.

In Response To: Would the advocates for the new rule state how they would rule Ken's two examples? (MishyPoo)

I really hadn't thought you were referring specifically to me Michelle, and (I hope) on behalf of all non USBGF posters, apology accepted for unintentionally seeming to invalidate our opinions.

"If you are meek it is your own fault if you get taken advantage of."

Well, yes. But wouldn't it be better for as many rules as possible to be created, and then written up unambiguously, so that things are as clear as possible for all concerned? I'm thinking, for example, of 'vigorous shaking' and 'simultaneous rolling' as well as the thread issue. Let's try and make things as b&w as possible and the meek may get taken advantage of less.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.