|
BGonline.org Forums
Revised Idea for Performance Grading
Posted By: Rick Janowski In Response To: Suggested Idea for Performance Grading (Rick Janowski)
Date: Saturday, 4 October 2014, at 5:37 a.m.
Thank you for all the great feedback and new perspectives.
Out of interest I averaged out the 4 proposals for the 5 levels proposed getting the sequence, 5.9, 5.1, 4.4, 3.75, 3.1.
It then occurred to me that the pr difference between levels should generally reduce as the pr gets lower. Using a ratio of about 0.87 gives the following sequence: 6.1, 5.3, 4.6, 4, 3.5, 3.0.
I accept the points made by Mislav and Tim that following too closely the chess grades could lead to perceived incongruity. I think it might be better to have three master grades, M1, M2 and M3 and have three Grandmaster grades, GM1, GM2, GM3, with the following limiting prs:
M1: 6.00 to 5.29
M2: 5.30 to 4.59
M3: 4.60 to 3.99
G1: 4.00 to 3.49
G2: 3.50 to 3.01
G3: 3.00 and lower
Note that Jason Pack’s proposed sequence tallies best with this sequence. This also tallies with the Mochy 4.0 Club target which effectively caters for the Grand Master grades.
This is my revised proposal.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.