[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

GNU

Posted By: Mike Petch
Date: Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 4:44 a.m.

In Response To: GNU (Seth)

The next version will be using the newer neural net (v0.91). Such a release may now be pushed back to next weekend. I spent part of this week running the Depreli positions. The data used is close to what was used for XG's 2012 Depreli Study. That can be found here:

http://www.bkgm.com/articles/Keith/DepreliBotComparison/

The Depreli study is a benchmark designed to see how well the bots play against each other (not necessarily bot vs humans). Please see the notes at the bottom of that link for some additional comments on the matter.

If we use the Depreli data that I generated this week using World Class (2-ply), Grandmaster(3-ply), and 4-ply on both the older GNUBG (20121023 Windows Release) and the new test version (0.91), some general things I can say without posting any specific data is:

- New GNUBG World Class (2ply) outperforms 4ply on the older version - All three playing levels of the new version exceed (or are comparable) to the performance of the best results (4-ply) of the older version - The best improvement was for 3-ply (Grandmaster). It seems the cube actions at 3-ply are significantly better. GNUBG suffered greatly with an even/odd ply effect, and the effect may be less of an issue in the new version. - Overall, cube play was much better between the old and new version.

Compared to XG2 and XG1 in the 2012 chart at the link above, it seems the new GNUBG on 4ply may be about as strong as XG v2, 4-ply. GNUBG's GrandMaster (3ply) is about as strong as XG v2, 3-ply. GNUBG's 4ply is a reasonably close to the strength of XG v2, 3-ply red.

I think that Grandmaster (3-ply cube, 3-ply checker) on the newer version may be the best option when looking for reasonable strength at a reasonable speed.

Note: 4-ply look ahead in XG is equivalent to 3-ply in GNUBG, 3-ply in XG is equivalent to 2ply in GNUBG and so forth.

I'm not posting specific numbers as I still have to validate the results, but at this time the observations above seem to be accurate given what the Depreli study measures.

Kudos to Philippe Michel for doing the retraining of the neural net.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.