BGonline.org Forums

Retrograde backgammon puzzle

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 6:32 p.m.

In Response To: Retrograde backgammon puzzle (Timothy Chow)

And even accepting the unstated leaps of (i)Moriarty was just on the bar and ii) Moriarty did an illegal play that was to his benefit

the conclusion stuill does not follow. A roll of 62 also gives Moriarty better win chance if played illegally.

Messages In This Thread

• Retrograde backgammon puzzle
  Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 24 February 2013, at 8:22 p.m.
  • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
    Smcrtorchs -- Sunday, 24 February 2013, at 11:20 p.m.
  • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
    benf -- Monday, 25 February 2013, at 12:56 a.m.
    • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 25 February 2013, at 5:27 p.m.
      • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
        6stones -- Monday, 25 February 2013, at 7:25 p.m.
        • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
          6stones -- Monday, 25 February 2013, at 10:29 p.m.
      • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 1:19 a.m.
        • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 4:41 a.m.
          • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
            Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 6:01 p.m.
            • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
              Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 6:32 p.m.
    • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 26 February 2013, at 1:10 a.m.
  • Retrograde backgammon puzzle
    playBunny -- Saturday, 2 March 2013, at 9:52 p.m.