[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Gammonless MET?

Posted By: Tom Keith
Date: Saturday, 29 December 2012, at 8:38 p.m.

In Response To: Gammonless MET? (Timothy Chow)

Assuming perfectly efficient cubes ...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 .500 .750 .750 .875 .875 .938 .938 .969 .969 .984 .984 .992
2 .250 .500 .600 .722 .779 .849 .880 .918 .935 .956 .965 .977
3 .250 .400 .500 .613 .682 .762 .805 .857 .884 .916 .932 .952
4 .125 .278 .387 .500 .583 .668 .727 .787 .826 .866 .892 .918
5 .125 .221 .318 .417 .500 .585 .650 .715 .763 .811 .844 .877
6 .062 .151 .238 .332 .415 .500 .570 .640 .695 .749 .791 .830
7 .062 .120 .195 .273 .350 .430 .500 .570 .629 .687 .734 .779
8 .031 .082 .143 .213 .285 .360 .430 .500 .562 .622 .674 .723
9 .031 .065 .116 .174 .237 .305 .371 .438 .500 .561 .616 .668
10 .016 .044 .084 .134 .189 .251 .313 .378 .439 .500 .556 .610
11 .016 .035 .068 .108 .156 .209 .266 .326 .384 .444 .500 .555
12 .008 .023 .048 .082 .123 .170 .221 .277 .332 .390 .445 .500

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.