|
BGonline.org Forums
Number of checkers represented at lower counts
Posted By: Ian Shaw In Response To: Number of checkers represented at lower counts (Nack Ballard)
Date: Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
I don't think we should insist on 15-chequer positions, but rather the position with the lowest possible wastage.
Once the pip count gets below about 79, we would expect to be bearing off, and if we are managing to do so optimally then the lowest wastage positions will have less than 15 chequers.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.